
Category: writing
Goodbye, Blogger. Hello, Bloggers! Google To Rebrand Picasa and Blogger.com
Eagle-eyed reader Joey the C sent me a link with the news that the Picasa and Blogger brands are going bye-byes. I said the other day that Google+ is a great way to make Picasa relevant, and the shift to Google Photo and Google Blogs makes total sense as Google positions itself for the widespread rollout of Google+. They need a unified front, afterall. And before we compare them too much to the old AOL fishbowl (which Facebook is trying to become), the seams between Google’s products feel…nimbler…to me. With Google+ and the overall Google account experience, I still feel like I’m out on the web, whereas with Facebook, I feel very much like I’m on one site or in one social network. Thoughts?
I, for one, will be glad to see the Blogger name retired. We’re all bloggers, and most of us use WordPress =).
Related articles
- Google To Rebrand Blogger and Picasa in Google+ Push (jobcontax.wordpress.com)
- Blogger and Picassa to Be Retired by Google (accesscomptech.wordpress.com)
- EXCLUSIVE: Google to Retire Blogger & Picasa Brands in Google+ Push (mashable.com)
Did Google Just Find a Way to Make GoogleBuzz Usable?
Yes, I think they did, and those sneaky sneakersons did it with Google+. They also snuck relevance into Picasa while you weren’t looking. 
Within Google+, GoogleBuzz is like a separate feed of whatever you’ve set to automatically go to Buzz (since no one, ever, uses Buzz on purpose). So if your Twitter is set to go to Buzz, it now also goes to your feed on Google+. The same is true for whatever you Buzz on the web. There’s also a +1 feed for whatever you +1. Both of these are separate from what you post “in” Google+ I think this is convenient. I haven’t figured out all of the privacy issues, but +1’s are public by nature. The Photos stream integrates Picasa, which, by the way, can receive automatic uploads (set to private by default) whenever you take a picture on your smart phone.
Google, you are sly. Very, very sly.
Just In Case You Thought I Was Kidding About Stripmalls and Greenspace in the Suburbs
You didn’t, did you? My good friend Joe just sent this along from the New York Times: 101 Uses for a Deserted Mall.
I didn’t use the word “retrofitting” in my discussion, but that’s what we’re really talking about, here, isn’t it? Retrofitting in the present and redesigning the future?
See also: DeadMalls.Com
Here’s the beginning of a press release from 1984 I found via DeadMalls:
ALLENTOWN, Pa. — Hess’s Department Stores, Inc., has agreed to purchase the Rices Nachmans Department Stores, an eight-unit chain in the Virginia Tidewater area owned by the Phillips-Van Heusen Corp.
Irwin Greenberg, president of Hess’s, said the price would be determined Feb. 4, following completion of the transaction. He said he expected the price to be in the $10 million range.
Earlier this year, Greenberg announced that Virginia would be a major growth area for Hess’s, either through acquisition or new store openings. Negotiations with Phillips-Van Heusen started last March, he said.
Rices Nachman units, averaging 60,000 square feet each, …
Does SteelStacks Have Its Head in the Sands?

Yes. Yes it does.
The skinny:
Once upon a time, Bethlehem Steel built something called America. It also won some wars. Later, Bethlehem Steel went bankrupt and a lot of people got screwed. Around here, this is no footnote to the decline of American industry. This is the whole sordid tale writ large in the Steel’s iconic blast furnaces, now owned by Las Vegas Sands, who also owns and operates Bethlehem’s Sands Casino on the former Bethlehem Steel grounds.
The blast furnaces are one of the biggest unprotected pieces of American history I can think of. The feds don’t own them, nor does the Commonwealth nor some historical society or the city itself. They’re owned by the casino corporation and not the people. As such, they’ve been a big bargaining chip for the Sands.
We’ll give you access to your precious furnaces.
If.
If what, exactly?
The usual. You’ll see.
Being the very picture of corporate beneficence, the Sands sold land to the Bethlehem Redevelopment Authority (that’s another way of saying “the people,” or “the public,” isn’t it?) for $1 so the city could develop its plans for an arts and cultural center. That arts and cultural center, SteelStacks, continues to come to fruition.
But here’s the catch, reported by the Allentown Morning Call: Under the terms of the $1 sale, public fomenting of anything disagreeable to the casino is not permitted, including, say, labor rallies and public debate about the efficacy of casinos as economic incubators (or dire social externalities). From the Morning Call piece:
In the 15-page deed signed last week, the Redevelopment Authority agreed that labor unions can’t organize on the property. There also can’t be activities that would promote “a theme” that a “reasonable casino operator” would consider “offensive.”
Similar restrictions were written into the deals with nonprofits ArtsQuest and PBS39 for their properties at SteelStacks.
According to the Call, PBS39 (the P stands for “public”) has said their deal will not interfere with programming and editorial choices. That sounds like shorthand for “we’ve got an army of lawyers and a ton of cash you don’t know about,” which, of course, they don’t. I wonder who at the Sands has the job of monitoring 39’s broadcasts? Do they get nervous when Bruce Springsteen concerts from the 70’s run in the wee hours of the night during pledge campaigns?
As the Call points out, any talk of unionizing the Sands workers is prohibited on SteelStacks grounds by the terms of the casino’s “generous donation.” My, how history repeats. Just over a hundred years ago, labor toiled under management with similar attitudes and political muscle on this very spot. This isn’t ironic, friends. It’s Orwellian.
I should point out that many people blame part of the Steel’s downfall on the eventual excesses of power-hungry union heads. This narrative has been applied across all sectors of American industry and with reason. But it’s also the case that before the unions came, the hands that built America had no protection, no voice, and no organizing strength. The same is true for the casino’s workforce on these grounds even now. And if you’re inclined to believe, as the numbers show, that casinos in low-income areas like South Bethlehem do more economic harm than good to people on the margins, this is all the more egregious.
Give us your tired and your poor so we can bilk them.
Give us your jobless so we can bilk them, too.
Give us your free-speech so we don’t scrap your history.
In the freest country in the world, what kind of choice is that?
Is This The Rest of the Rebooted Justice League?
Via Graphic Policy, this image is out and about today, but does it show the rebooted Justice League’s full roster?:
Who knows. But the statement about DC’s new “Big 7” is clear: Green Arrow out, Cyborg in. I still want the League’s Green Lantern to be John Stewart, but I hope he gets a big starring marquee role somewhere else in the new DC Universe.
A few thoughts on aesthetics:
By now, we’ve had some time to get used to all the lines and panels in these costumes. I still don’t like them. There’s too much quasi-realism going on, especially with Superman. Then look at Flash’s boots. Them compare them to whatever Hal Jordan has on his feet (classic boots? Fine, but next to the overwrought and inexplicably shiny things the others are wearing, they look like pajama feet).
I do like how the S-shield pops on Supes. Still not fan of the red seat-belt on his waist.

What we can’t tell from this image are the places of the secondary and tertiary heroes on the side panels in the new DCU. Are they JL subteams? I like that idea. Are they field agents? I’d like that, too. Side question: How do Hawkman and Green Arrow feel about not having a place at the leadership table? How about their fans?
In short: good image, good team, still some mystery. Please, less panels and piping. We’re not making movies, here.
Right.
(Blue Beetle/Ted Kord image by Lunchbox Photography via Flickr)
The Dodgers Are Broke (and that news isn’t breaking).
I’m looking at you, CNN.
“Dodgers File For Bankruptcy Protection” was flagged as Breaking News a few minutes ago on CNN. Okay, so the filing technically is news, but we all knew it was coming. It’s like a train that started crashing 100 miles ago and just kept sliding down a large, slightly inclined hill until it bottomed out. We’re not exactly at bottom yet, but we’re close.
Move the Dodgers back to Brooklyn? That would be breaking news. And also, awesome.
I should add that Howard Megdal, the author of the linked piece, makes some great points, one of which is NOT giving the Yankees a playoffs bye for giving up rights to block a Dodger move back to the New York market. A bye into the playoffs is worse than the Wild Card.
Related articles
- Torre to Buy Dodgers (19thcenturybaseball.wordpress.com)

