Cornel West’s Revolution and Romans 12

Cornel West, keynote speaker at the Martin Lut...
Cornel West (via Wikipedia)

In the relatively short course of my 31 years, I’ve learned quite a few things from John Cusack.  Just now, via Twitter, he turned me on to a new piece by Cornel West in yesterday’s New York TimesMartin Luther King Jr. Would Want a Revolution, Not a Memorial .

About 95% of this resonated with me.  I paused here:

“In concrete terms, this means…extensive community and media organizing; civil disobedience; and life and death confrontations with the powers that be. Like King, we need to put on our cemetery clothes and be coffin-ready for the next great democratic battle.”

Is being, in West’s words, “coffin-ready,” a condition for participation in this kind of revolution? It’s true we’re talking about life and death stakes: healthcare, poverty, justice, peace — every day, people live or die in this country and abroad because of policy decisions around these issues.  People live and die because of campaign donations, kickbacks, deals.  West is calling for civil disobedience while telling us, like King before him, that even the most civil of disobedience could get free people killed right here in America.  That’s chilling, sobering, and believable, isn’t it?

West is a masterful communicator and rhetorician.  For that reason, I wish he’d been more clear about those “life and death confrontations with the powers that be” required in the “next great democratic battle.”  It’s clear to me that in West’s view, the threat of violent force in these struggles is from the side of established Power. I hope we’re all reading that the same way.

West notes:

“King’s response to our crisis can be put in one word: revolution. A revolution in our priorities, a re-evaluation of our values, a reinvigoration of our public life and a fundamental transformation of our way of thinking and living that promotes a transfer of power from oligarchs and plutocrats to everyday people and ordinary citizens.”

The 12th chapter of the Apostle Paul’s letter to Roman Christians in the first century CE deals with similar themes of transformative agency.  In Pauline terms, the renewal of our minds transforms our inner lives an enables us to test and see the will of God in and for our communities.  “Do not conformed to the pattern of this world,” Paul tells the Roman community, “but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will. ”  The “pattern of the world” (also translated as “age”) in first century Rome was one of anti-Judaism at the highest imperial levels. Jewish Christians, who had established the city’s earliest Christian gatherings, had been exiled along with all other Jewish people by the Emperor Claudius, and by the time of Paul’s writing had only recently been able to return under Nero. Leadership tensions seem to have risen up between the returning Jewish Christians and the Gentile Christians who’d assumed responsibility for the community during the Jewish exile.  In a larger historical context, the persecution of Jews in Alexandria as attested by Philo occurred just 20 years before the writing of this missive, and the persecution of Christians under Nero in Rome on the horizon.  Issues of justice, access, and economics are pressing.

For Paul and West, the alternative to transformative renewal is continued conformity to dominant social paradigms, and it’s no coincidence that in both cases, the call is from these destructive patterns and to new ways of being, thinking, doing.  West says “King weeps from his grave. He never confused substance with symbolism. He never conflated a flesh and blood sacrifice with a stone and mortar edifice. We rightly celebrate his substance and sacrifice because he loved us all so deeply. Let us not remain satisfied with symbolism because we too often fear the challenge he embraced.”  Paul said “Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship.”

In his own way, Paul continually challenges the Church to be “coffin-ready.”  We are to present ourselves as living sacrifices.  To live, Paul says, “is Christ, and to die is gain.” (Philippians 1:21).  “Dying to self” is one of the most revisited Christian tropes across denominations, precisely because it’s what we believe Christ modeled in his ministry and teaching.  Dr. West, like Dr. King, draws from the deep well of Christian tradition, pulling succor from a source that has been used in other hands to poison.

What enables transformation? For Paul and West, the process beings somewhere near renewal.  West calls us to re-evaluate, re-align, and re-prioritize. Paul says that the ability to so will come by the grace given to us, and that we might start on our end by reorienting ourselves towards others:  “Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought, but rather think of yourself with sober judgment, in accordance with the faith God has distributed to each of you.”  The Apostle prefaces this charge with an important recognition: “For by the grace given me I say to every one of you: Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought…” The reorientation of self vis-a-vis the Other, or what West calls “a fundamental transformation of our way of thinking and living,” follows grace.  As Chapter 12 progresses, Paul claims that any giftedness any of us have is afforded to us only by God’s grace.  It must also be true that the ability to be transformed by the renewing of the mind starts, itself, with grace, and it is grace that invites us to see and treat each other graciously.

Transformation and renewal, of our minds and of our bodies politic, start and end with the kind of good will we can’t earn.  We must lean into already-present grace, and it’s only by grace that we begin to see past the end of our own lives and to locate grace in others. Grace, as Paul would have it, follows grace.  “Twas grace,” the great American spiritual says, “that taught my heart to fear, and grace my fears reliev’d.”  It is grace in us that sees grace in others.  It is goodness in us that finds goodness in others.  It is God in us who recognizes God in others, who makes us care about the lives and fates of others, who never stops trying to wash the word “others” from our renewal-needing, imperfectly transformed minds and points of view.

If grace is, like Paul suggests, the starting point for personal and communal transformation, how are we to live graciously in the midst of revolution, should it come?  Paul offers a provisional ethic of life within the hostile empire of his day, to the very people in its center:

9 Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good. 10 Be devoted to one another in love. Honor one another above yourselves. 11 Never be lacking in zeal, but keep your spiritual fervor, serving the Lord. 12 Be joyful in hope, patient in affliction, faithful in prayer. 13Share with the Lord’s people who are in need. Practice hospitality.

14 Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse. 15 Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn. 16 Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited.

17 Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. 18 If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. 19 Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord. 20 On the contrary:

“If your enemy is hungry, feed him;
if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.
In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”

21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

That’s a fairly civil, and maybe even holy, disobedience.  It turns out that grace isn’t just the author and perfecter of our transformations, but is also the essential Christian ethic in crisis and upheaval.  How fitting, then, that Romans 12 came up as a lectionary reading for millions of Christians across the world last Sunday and that in the days before and since, Christians from all perspectives and experiences have wrestled with it.  I can’t know for sure that Romans 12 was part of Dr. West’s Christian practice Sunday past, but I’m glad John Cusack got me thinking about it.

We Must Become the Shire: American Spring, Dr. King, and Please, God, Something Different

Last week’s post, “How Broken are OurPolitics? Will Gen-X Save the World?” generated a lot of discussion and creativity.  A good friend of mine, one of those Boomers who do amazing things for their communities and in the lives of people, suggested (via Facebook) a new political model based on the communal virtues of JRR Tolkien’s Hobbits:

 Here’s an idea: why not pool say, 5 candidates (of differing political philosophies) randomly every 2 years, have them write an essay about what needs to be done in DC, vote on them, and send the winner to DC for a non re-electable 2 year term, repeating the process every 2 years.  Those who wield power best are those who don’t seek it. It’s why hobbits carried the seductive ring of power better than all others. We need hobbit rule. (Btw, this won’t happen bc those who love power (our elected reps ie Sauron) would have to amend the constitution and voluntarily relinquish power. One can dream, though).

Yes. We all can dream.  Which reminds me when some people dream, amazing things happen.  Today, the public gets its first glimpse of the new Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial on the National Mall in Washington.  It stands between the Jefferson and Lincoln Memorials and is, to paraphrase one observer, the only monument on the Mall to a man of color and a man of peace.

Think about that.  All of our other monuments are to men who have administered wars.  Observing that is not to disparage them, (there are other reasons for that in most cases) but to recognize King’s unique voice and prophetic place as an American  leader committed to waging change by waging peace.  The centerpiece of the MLK memorial is his form on the “Stone of Hope,” and I hope his memory will stand there on the Mall as an indictment of a system that has long since given up on the work entrusted to it.  I hope it stands there like a scandal, preaching peace to national bodies who tear our body politic apart with their addictions to power, their allegiances to lobbies, their cynical crocodile patriotism and two-party no-choice  horseshit rodeo.

As the Arab Spring becomes, even as I type, the Late Summer of Gaddafi, I wonder what we’ll do a year from now.  Will we be in the process of nominating, again, two clowns from two circus parties to pantomime a contest between competing visions for the future?   Will someone from the left have come to save us from Obama?  Will a libertarian deliver us from Perry?  Will we, the pissed-off Middle, flock to our party primaries and rummage through that discount bin again?  God help us. Can Spring 2012 please be something different?  Can we start planning now our own little process of renewal?  We have free speech and the freedom to assemble.  We have the right to demand better options, better leaders, better people.  An American Spring would cost us nothing, but what might it accomplish? What would it look like? Who would even show?

How about families with their kids? How about college students? How about the  homeless, uninsured, and unemployed?  How about conservatives, progressives and libertarians who, it will have turned out, are united around the issues of government reform more than they’ve been driven apart by nonsense party lines and structures? How about people of all faiths and people of no faith all committed to being people of goodwill?  How about veterans and pacifists?  How about immigrants?

Imagine meeting at the Mall at the great scandal of a monument. Imagine finding poetic, sublime irony in the fact that yes, it’s made from Chinese granite, and that yes, the oppressive Chinese government, eager to own us all,  financed part of its construction.  Oh confused and frustrated body politic, oh 20-45 demographic, take your place, for God’s sake! And for your children’s.