by Dan Hipp via Comics Alliance.
Category: writing
Vonnegut as Veteran: Slaugtherhouse-Five and PTSD
Via The Daily Dish.
The Good Old Days Weren’t Always Good: A Transatlantic Reminder to Tim Stanley
But it isn’t just Obama’s flaws that are making this race interesting. Mitt Romney might not be the most charismatic candidate, but that’s a hidden strength in an election that’s all about competence and getting back to the basics of what once made America work so well. This week, the pro-Obama journalist Andrew Sullivan wrote that with his wealth, good looks and apple-pie conservatism, Romney is like “a focus-group tested model president from 1965”. Sullivan obviously doesn’t realise how popular the TV show Mad Men is. Who wouldn’t warm to a candidate that represents an age marked by low unemployment, stable families and a laissez-faire attitude towards drinking at work?
At first blush, this bit from Tim Stanley’s “Obama is Carter” piece feels clever. If you’re white, straight, and male, it might take a least one full second to remember that 1965 isn’t the good old days from everyone’s perspective.
I’ll give Stanley this much: Don Draper assumed a whole new persona when it was expedient to do so, and his public life is one huge pose. Romney and Obama are vulnerable to this charge on various counts. Does anyone really believe Romney’s ashamed of RomneyCare or that he’s a pro-life? Does anyone really believe that Obama is a federalist on marriage equality?
Yes, this is what politicians do. But Obama was supposed to end all of that. As of right now, he’ll be lucky to win a second term.
Are We Getting More Progressive on Abortion?
Politico on the Gallup news that self-identification as “pro-choice” is at an all-time low.
Drilling down, we find that 52% of those polled do believe abortion should be legal in some circumstances, while 20% believe it should always be legal.
I’m not trying to be cute with words like “progressive.” I’ve said here before that I believe there are solid “pro-life” arguments to be made from the progressive ethos. As we clearly progress nationally on other issues (marriage equality, for one) I wonder what these numbers will look like a few years down the road.
The Sub In Suburb: We’ve Been Building Suburbia on the Backs of the Urban Poor for 50 Years
I just posted an excerpt from and a link to a piece on Atlantic about the future of American cities. Let me share again this salient point:
“That economic shift away from cities was the root cause of America’s urban collapse. Starting in the 1950s, the middle class – and the American Dream – migrated from urban neighborhoods to the suburbs. Industry and corporations soon followed.
Ester Fuchs, director of Columbia University’s Urban and Social Policy program, details the fallout in the latest issue of Columbia’s Journal of International Affairs:
America’s great cities were left in economic free fall, with concentrated poverty, unemployment, high crime rates, failing public schools and severely deteriorating physical infrastructure, including roads, mass transit and parks. Academics and policy makers agreed that cities were irrelevant to America’s economic future; they would become places for poor minorities who could not afford to move to the suburbs. Urban policy became code for social-welfare policy.
*
This is true in Allentown, and this is at the core of the current debate over the use of EIT (earned income tax) money from people who work in the City but don’t live there. Where, oh where, should that money go?
In Pennsylvania, until 1962, the EIT stayed in the municipality (read: City) where it was earned. Then legislators got together with academics and social planners and decided to punish poor minorities for wanting civil rights and jobs in Northern cities. Low and behold, the EIT, from 1962 on, goes back to the places where workers live, regardless of where the earned income tax was, you know, earned.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania thus funded and directed the great subsidization of the suburbs, the chewing up of green space, and the decline and fall of urban cores. That’s what happened in Allentown and surrounding townships. Fifty years later, those townships feel entitled to the status quo and to the money their residents earn in Allentown. Along comes legislation giving that money back to Allentown to help fund redevelopment, and the townships sue the City.
I hope this highlights what’s really needed: a Commonwealth-wide law directing all EITs back to the cities in which they are earned. Thank you, townships, for highlighting that need. You are, perhaps, more progressive than people think.
was sick a whol…
was sick a whole bunch last week. getting back in the swing of things.
Did Obama Allow “Born in Kenya” Narrative? If So, Does It Bother You?
You’ve heard that in 1991, literary agency Acton & Dystel typo’d the part of client Barack Obama’s bio that mentioned his place of birth. (They said it was Kenya).
If a story from WND can be believed, successor firm Dystel & Gooderich kept the mistake in their client’s profile up through April 2007, when it was then corrected.
I don’t have any reason to doubt that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. At some point or another, however, Barack Obama seems to have sanctioned the belief that he was born in Kenya, or allowed it to linger. What started as a mistake at Acton & Dystel in 1991 was allowed to remain in the narrative until after Obama started running for president.
It’s hard to believe that a Obama was unaware of the error for 16 years. For a young writer trying to sell a first book, “born in Kenya, successful in America,” was a much better hook than the truth.
Does it bother you that Obama seems to have let this error persist for so long? Not “bother” in the sense that it has you questioning his eligibility, bother in the sense that it has you questioning his character?
